Methodology of Recording

From We Are Ts'msyen
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Methodology of Recording

Category: Tsm’syen Law Page status: Working

Purpose

This page describes the methodology used to record Tsm’syen law, history, and governance materials. It records principles that guide how information is documented, preserved, and referenced while protecting meaning, authority, and context.

This page does not replace oral authority or lived practice.

General principles

  • Recording supports continuity; it does not create law.
  • Method matters as much as content.
  • Context must accompany all records.
  • Accuracy and restraint preserve integrity.
  • Recording does not transfer interpretive authority.

RECORDING

Meaning

  • Recording refers to documenting law, memory, or process.
  • Records may be oral, written, visual, or digital.
  • No single format is authoritative on its own.
  • Recording is a support to living law.

CONTEXT

Preservation of meaning

  • Context includes speaker, place, time, and purpose.
  • Removal from context risks distortion.
  • Records must identify scope and limitations.
  • Context determines lawful use.

AUTHORITY

Limits of records

  • Records do not override ayaawx.
  • Interpretation remains with lawful structures.
  • Written form does not elevate status.
  • Records cannot be used to substitute authority.

ACCURACY

Care and verification

  • Recording requires careful attention to accuracy.
  • Errors must be identified and corrected.
  • Selective recording distorts meaning.
  • Verification strengthens trust.

WITNESS

Confirmation

  • Witnessing supports legitimacy of records.
  • Witnesses confirm occurrence and process.
  • Witnessing does not alter content.
  • Lack of witness limits standing.

ACCESS

Use and protection

  • Access to records may be guided or limited.
  • Sensitive material requires protection.
  • Public availability does not equal unrestricted use.
  • Lawful access preserves trust.

REVISION

Correction and refinement

  • Records may be revised to correct errors.
  • Revision does not imply instability of law.
  • Corrections strengthen accuracy.
  • Version history supports transparency.

LIMITS

Boundaries

  • Recording does not freeze law.
  • External reinterpretation lacks authority.
  • Records may not be detached from law.
  • Misuse undermines legitimacy.

CONTINUITY

Preservation across generations

  • Recording supports teaching and learning.
  • Proper method ensures future understanding.
  • Continuity depends on careful preservation.
  • Law endures through correct method.

To be developed

  • Recording standards by material type
  • Witnessing requirements for records
  • Access levels and protections
  • Relationship to the National Ayaawk Codex
  • Source citations

Navigation >> Structure of the Nation >> National Ayaawk Codex >> Witness Statements >> House Adaawk >> Tribal Adaawk >> Protection from External Reinterpretation >> Ayaawx >> Adaawx