Pages without language links
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following pages do not link to other language versions.
Showing below up to 50 results in range #251 to #300.
- Elders do not legislate or command outcomes.
- Elders do not override ayaawx
- Elders do not replace house or clan authority
- Elders do not substitute for the responsibility of houses.
- Elders help prevent escalation and misuse of power
- Elders may advise houses, clans, or leadership
- Elders may assist in clarifying law across communities.
- Elders may assist in interpreting law and precedent
- Elders may assist in interpreting law in modern contexts.
- Elders may exist within or outside formal leadership roles
- Elders may guide restorative processes
- Elders may interpret law where clarity is required.
- Elders may provide guidance to the Assembly.
- Elders operate within, not above, Tsm’syen law.
- Elders prioritize balance over outcome
- Elders recall and contextualize adaawx when law is questioned
- Elders recall and interpret adaawx when land is in question
- Elders support the transmission of law through teaching and example
- Ensure continuity of life across generations
- Entries must reflect witnessed understanding.
- Errors may be corrected through lawful process.
- Errors must be identified and corrected.
- Escalation occurs when restoration is refused
- Escalation occurs when restoration is refused or ignored.
- Escalation remains lawful and proportionate.
- Events that established responsibility
- Excessive or careless use undermines balance.
- Exposure to responsibility should be appropriate to readiness
- External Reinterpretation Lacks Authority
- External affirmation does not replace transmission through adaawx
- External claims do not displace internal law.
- External claims do not replace internal law.
- External courts do not automatically possess competent jurisdiction.
- External forums do not determine internal meaning
- External frameworks do not redefine internal law
- External instruments may affirm, but do not create, Indigenous law
- External instruments may be cited to affirm standing and legitimacy
- External interpretation lacks lawful authority
- External jurisdiction is not presumed
- External law may not be used to narrow or redefine Tsm’syen rights
- External legal, academic, or administrative frameworks do not control meaning
- External legal systems do not define its meaning
- External pressure does not alter meaning
- External pressure does not define implementation
- External pressure does not justify permanent loss.
- External reinterpretation lacks authority.
- External relations are conducted
- External support does not imply external supremacy
- Extraction or alteration requires lawful recognition
- Failure of a house to respond affects its standing