Participation in house and national decision-making
Participation in House and National Decision-Making
In Ts’msyen law, decision-making is a **shared responsibility** grounded in relationship, role, and accountability. Participation is not limited to elected positions or individual authority; it flows through houses (*wilp*), clans (*pdeex*), name-bearing roles, Elders, and youth.
Lawful decisions arise through **process**, not power.
Foundational Principle
Participation is guided by ayaawx.
This means:
- those with responsibility must participate
- those without authority do not dominate
- all decisions must withstand witnessing
- balance is maintained through multiple voices
No single person decides alone.
Participation at the House (Wilp) Level
The wilp is the primary decision-making body.
Participation within a wilp includes:
Hereditary Name Holders
Name holders:
- bring matters forward
- speak for the house
- carry decisions into action
- answer for outcomes
They act on behalf of the wilp, not themselves.
Elder Women and Elders
Elders:
- guide deliberation
- recall precedent
- assess long-term consequences
- correct imbalance
Elder women hold particular authority in matters of continuity, succession, and adoption.
Adult House Members
Adult members:
- contribute knowledge and perspective
- raise concerns affecting the house
- support or question proposals
- share responsibility for outcomes
Participation implies accountability.
Youth
Youth:
- observe and learn decision-making processes
- assist in house responsibilities
- ask questions respectfully
- prepare for future roles
Their presence ensures continuity.
How House Decisions Are Made
House decisions are reached through:
- discussion and consensus
- Elder guidance
- clan balance
- confirmation in feast when required
Speed does not outweigh correctness.
Participation at the National Level
National decision-making occurs when matters affect:
- multiple houses
- multiple communities
- shared law or territory
- the integrity of ayaawx
National participation does not erase house authority.
Role of the National Council of Elders
At the national level, the Council:
- interprets ayaawx
- provides guidance on complex or emerging issues
- recalls shared precedent
- signals when law is at risk
The Council advises; it does not command.
Role of Houses at the National Level
Houses participate nationally through:
- their name holders
- delegated speakers
- recognized Elders
Houses remain the source of legitimacy.
Clan Balance
National decisions must reflect:
- participation across all clans
- avoidance of dominance by any one pdeex
- lawful witnessing
Clan balance ensures fairness and restraint.
Decision-Making Forums
Lawful participation occurs through recognized forums, including:
- house meetings
- feasts
- inter-house gatherings
- Elder councils
- national assemblies when required
Decisions made outside lawful forums lack authority.
Witnessing and Accountability
Participation requires witnessing.
Witnessing:
- confirms legitimacy
- records decisions
- assigns responsibility
- enables correction
Unwitnessed decisions are incomplete.
Limits on Participation
Participation is not unlimited.
Limits include:
- role and responsibility
- relevance to the matter
- respect for clan and house authority
- adherence to ayaawx
Disruption or domination violates process.
Correction and Reconsideration
Decisions may be revisited when:
- new information arises
- harm becomes apparent
- law was misunderstood
- proper participation was lacking
Correction strengthens law.
Living Governance
Participation in decision-making is a living practice.
It requires:
- listening
- patience
- respect
- accountability
- commitment to balance
Where participation is lawful and inclusive, Ts’msyen governance remains strong.