House-specific histories and legal narratives
House-Specific Histories and Legal Narratives
Each Ts’msyen house (*wilp* / *waap*) carries its own histories and legal narratives. These are not general histories, but **house-held records** that establish authority, responsibility, and lawful relationship to land, waters, names, and people under *ayaawx*.
House-specific histories are a core pillar of Ts’msyen law.
Foundational Understanding
House histories are legal narratives.
They:
- establish house identity and continuity
- record lawful acquisition of authority
- define stewardship over specific places
- explain rights and responsibilities
- preserve precedent for conduct and decision-making
They are law carried through memory, witness, and practice.
Relationship to Adaawx
House-specific histories are a form of adaawx.
They:
- belong to particular wilp
- are carried by name holders and Elders
- are affirmed through feast and witness
- function as legal precedent
Not all adaawx are national; many are house-specific.
Law, Not Folklore
House histories are not symbolic or illustrative.
They function as:
- title records
- jurisdictional evidence
- proof of responsibility
- guides for lawful conduct
- limits on authority
Reducing them to folklore removes their legal force.
Authority and Stewardship
House histories define:
- which lands and waters a wilp stewards
- how that stewardship was obtained
- what obligations continue today
- what conduct is required of members
- what consequences follow misuse or neglect
Authority exists only where responsibility has been carried.
Names, Crests, and Roles
House narratives are inseparable from:
- hereditary names
- crests and symbols
- roles passed through succession
- obligations tied to name-holding
Names do not exist without narrative; narrative does not exist without responsibility.
Access and Protocol
House histories are not universally accessible.
Access depends on:
- membership or relationship
- role and responsibility
- context and purpose
- consent of the wilp
- guidance of Elders
Some histories are shared publicly; others are restricted.
Feast and Witness
House histories gain and retain authority through:
- feast presentation
- public witness
- acknowledgment by other houses and clans
- repetition and correction over time
Unwitnessed claims do not become law.
Use in Dispute Resolution
House-specific legal narratives are used to:
- resolve territorial disputes
- clarify stewardship obligations
- assess lawful authority
- correct overreach or misuse
- guide restoration after harm
Past conduct informs present responsibility.
Recording and Protection
House histories may be recorded with care.
Recording:
- supports memory
- protects against loss
- does not transfer authority
- does not authorize public release
- remains subject to correction
Unauthorized recording or publication is a breach of ayaawx.
Relationship to National Law
House-specific narratives exist within shared Ts’msyen law.
They:
- support national coherence
- prevent abstraction of authority
- ground law in place and relationship
- protect diversity within unity
National law is carried through houses, not above them.
Teaching and Continuity
House histories are taught through:
- oral instruction
- apprenticeship
- lived stewardship
- feast participation
- correction and guidance
Transmission ensures that authority and responsibility remain aligned.
Living Legal Narratives
House-specific histories are living law.
They:
- guide present conduct
- adapt through lawful renewal
- remain accountable through witness
- protect future generations
Where house histories are respected, Ts’msyen law remains grounded and whole.