Forms of national decision-making under Ayaawx

From We Are Ts'msyen
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forms of National Decision-Making under Ayaawx

Under Ts’msyen law, national decision-making arises from *ayaawx* and is guided by responsibility, balance, and lawful process. Decisions affecting more than one house, clan, or community are approached carefully to preserve authority, unity, and continuity.

National decision-making does not replace house (*wilp*) authority; it coordinates and aligns it where shared action is required.


Foundational Understanding

Ayaawx governs decision-making as well as outcomes.

National decisions are required when:

  • matters cross territorial or community boundaries
  • shared systems are affected
  • cumulative harm is present
  • external pressures affect multiple wilp
  • unity is necessary to protect law, land, or people

Decision-making serves responsibility, not speed.


Role of the Wilp

Wilp remain the foundation of decision-making.

Each wilp:

  • deliberates internally
  • considers stewardship obligations
  • consults Elders
  • determines its position
  • authorizes representation within mandate

National decisions must reflect wilp positions.


Clan (Pdeex) Balancing

Clans contribute balance and continuity.

Clan involvement may:

  • guide fairness
  • prevent escalation
  • ensure kinship obligations are respected
  • support alignment between houses

Clan balance protects against unilateral action.


Consensus Through Alignment

Ayaawx favors alignment rather than simple majority.

Alignment may involve:

  • extended discussion
  • clarification of concerns
  • modification of proposals
  • time for reflection
  • ceremonial affirmation

Decision-making continues until balance is reached or action is lawfully limited.


Elder-Guided Deliberation

Elders guide national decision-making by:

  • recalling adaawx and precedent
  • interpreting ayaawx
  • assessing long-term impact
  • protecting future generations
  • advising restraint where necessary

Elders guide; they do not impose.


Feast and Public Witness

Major national decisions gain legitimacy through:

  • public declaration
  • feast or gathering
  • witness by houses and clans
  • acknowledgment of obligations

Unwitnessed decisions lack standing.


Councils and Working Bodies

For complex matters, councils or working bodies may be formed to:

  • gather information
  • coordinate communication
  • prepare recommendations
  • ensure process remains lawful

Such bodies act within mandate and do not replace decision-makers.


Decision by Lawful Restraint

Ayaawx recognizes restraint as a form of decision.

Choosing:

  • not to proceed
  • to pause
  • to limit action
  • to defer to future deliberation

is lawful when risk to balance exists.


Response to Urgent Matters

In urgent situations:

  • temporary protective measures may be taken
  • Elders and wilp are informed
  • decisions are revisited and witnessed as soon as possible

Urgency does not override law.


Relationship to External Engagement

Where national decisions involve external systems:

  • ayaawx remains guiding law
  • internal decision-making is not bypassed
  • mandates are clearly defined
  • reinterpretation is rejected

External timelines do not control Ts’msyen law.


Living Process

National decision-making under ayaawx is living.

It adapts through:

  • reflection
  • correction
  • renewed witness
  • changing circumstances

Process matters as much as outcome.


Continuity

Through lawful national decision-making:

  • unity is preserved without centralization
  • authority remains grounded
  • law is protected
  • future generations are considered

Where ayaawx guides decision-making, the Nation remains whole.