Interpretation is offered, not imposed

From We Are Ts'msyen
Revision as of 05:44, 21 January 2026 by Amusterer (talk | contribs) (initiation arm)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:LawPageHeader

Principle Interpretation is offered, not imposed.

Purpose

This page records a core limit on legal interpretation in Tsm’syen law. Interpretation exists to clarify, guide, and support lawful authority. It must not be used as a tool to compel obedience, override jurisdiction, or force outcomes without consent or recognition.

Statement of Law

Interpretation:

  • is offered as guidance
  • may be accepted, questioned, or declined
  • does not compel compliance by itself
  • gains authority through recognition, not force

Lawful interpretation respects autonomy within houses, clans, and leadership roles.

Nature of Interpretation

Offered, Not Forced

  • Interpretation is shared, not commanded.
  • It does not carry automatic enforcement power.
  • Acceptance depends on trust, relevance, and lawful context.

Grounded in Relationship

  • Interpretation is meaningful only within recognized relationships.
  • Authority to interpret arises from conduct, knowledge, and accountability.
  • Imposed interpretation damages legitimacy and balance.

Accountable to Consequence

  • Interpretations must withstand reflection over time.
  • Harmful or self-serving interpretations lose credibility.
  • Interpretation remains subject to correction through witness and memory.

Who May Offer Interpretation

Interpretation may be offered by:

  • elders
  • house members with recognized knowledge
  • leaders acting within their lawful role
  • witnesses recalling precedent

Offering interpretation does not elevate the speaker above the law.

Limits

  • Interpretation cannot be imposed by position alone.
  • Interpretation cannot override house or clan authority.
  • Interpretation cannot be used to silence dissent.
  • Interpretation cannot substitute for consent or lawful process.

Modern Context

In modern governance settings, this principle prevents:

  • reinterpretation being used as coercion
  • legal advice being framed as binding order
  • external legal logic being imposed through “expert” authority
  • decisions being justified after the fact by forced interpretation

Practical Indicators

A lawful interpretation will:

  • be presented openly
  • invite reflection and discussion
  • respect jurisdictional boundaries
  • allow disagreement without punishment
  • remain defensible before witnesses

An imposed interpretation will often:

  • rely on position or threat
  • dismiss relationship and history
  • demand compliance without process
  • centralize authority improperly

See also