Why a house holds authority in a territory

From We Are Ts'msyen
Revision as of 00:21, 11 January 2026 by Amusterer (talk | contribs) (initiation arm)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Why a House Holds Authority in a Territory

Principle

A house holds authority in a territory because it carries **lawful responsibility** for that place.

Territory is not owned. It is **held in trust**.

Basis of Authority

A house holds authority in a territory when that authority is established and maintained through Adaawk.

Adaawk record:

  • how the authority arose
  • why it exists
  • what responsibilities accompany it
  • what limits apply to it

Authority that cannot be traced through adaawk is incomplete.

Responsibility Over Control

Territorial authority does not grant unrestricted power.

A house holding authority is responsible for:

  • protecting the land and its life
  • regulating access and use
  • preventing harm
  • responding to violations according to law

Authority exists only while responsibility is upheld.

Continuity

Authority does not rest in individuals. It continues through **names**.

When a name is taken:

  • the legal person continues
  • obligations remain active
  • responsibility does not reset

This ensures accountability across generations (see: Names as Legal Continuity).

Trust Relationship

A house speaks for its territory on behalf of:

  • the people
  • future generations
  • the wider legal order of the Nation

Authority exists to care for the land, not to possess it (see: Future Generations).

Scope

This page records a **foundational principle of law**.

Detailed applications, house-specific adaawk, and case-based interpretations are recorded elsewhere and continue to develop over time.

Related Pages