Oldest pages

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Showing below up to 50 results in range #651 to #700.

View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. Interpretation of Tsm’syen law belongs to the Tsm’syen (14:33, 15 February 2026)
  2. Elders, houses, and lawful structures guide interpretation (14:34, 15 February 2026)
  3. Meaning is derived from history, practice, and relationship (14:34, 15 February 2026)
  4. External interpretation lacks lawful authority (14:35, 15 February 2026)
  5. Translation into other languages is explanatory, not authoritative (14:39, 15 February 2026)
  6. Translated terms do not replace original concepts (14:41, 15 February 2026)
  7. Loss of meaning through translation does not alter law (14:42, 15 February 2026)
  8. Original language retains priority in interpretation (14:43, 15 February 2026)
  9. External legal, academic, or administrative frameworks do not control meaning (14:45, 15 February 2026)
  10. Comparison does not imply equivalence (14:46, 15 February 2026)
  11. Use of external terms does not import external authority (14:47, 15 February 2026)
  12. Law is not validated by external recognition (14:48, 15 February 2026)
  13. Recording law supports continuity and access (14:49, 15 February 2026)
  14. Records do not freeze or redefine law (14:50, 15 February 2026)
  15. Context must accompany recorded material (14:51, 15 February 2026)
  16. Misuse of records undermines integrity (14:53, 15 February 2026)
  17. Use of Tsm’syen law outside the Nation requires consent (14:55, 15 February 2026)
  18. Citation does not confer authority to reinterpret (14:57, 15 February 2026)
  19. Unauthorized reinterpretation weakens trust (14:58, 15 February 2026)
  20. Consent protects meaning and relationship (14:59, 15 February 2026)
  21. The Nation may refuse reinterpretation of its law (15:03, 15 February 2026)
  22. Refusal preserves legal integrity (15:05, 15 February 2026)
  23. Silence does not equal consent (15:07, 15 February 2026)
  24. Protection of law is a lawful act (15:08, 15 February 2026)
  25. Protection ensures continuity across generations (15:09, 15 February 2026)
  26. Correct interpretation strengthens governance (15:11, 15 February 2026)
  27. Teaching original meaning prevents erosion (15:12, 15 February 2026)
  28. Law survives through careful protection (15:13, 15 February 2026)
  29. Protection does not prevent dialogue (15:15, 15 February 2026)
  30. Dialogue does not permit alteration of law (15:16, 15 February 2026)
  31. External pressure does not alter meaning (15:18, 15 February 2026)
  32. Integrity is preserved through clear limits (15:19, 15 February 2026)
  33. UNDRIP, Section 25, and International Law (15:23, 15 February 2026)
  34. Tsm’syen law exists independently of external recognition (15:26, 15 February 2026)
  35. External instruments may affirm, but do not create, Indigenous law (15:27, 15 February 2026)
  36. Reference does not imply surrender of authority (15:29, 15 February 2026)
  37. International law is supportive, not interpretive (15:30, 15 February 2026)
  38. Ayaawx remains the primary legal authority (15:30, 15 February 2026)
  39. UNDRIP affirms the existence of Indigenous peoples, laws, and rights (15:32, 15 February 2026)
  40. UNDRIP recognizes the right to self-determination and self-governance (15:38, 15 February 2026)
  41. UNDRIP does not replace Indigenous legal orders (15:40, 15 February 2026)
  42. UNDRIP does not define the content of Tsm’syen law (15:42, 15 February 2026)
  43. Reference to UNDRIP supports, but does not constrain, Tsm’syen authority (15:46, 15 February 2026)
  44. Section 25 of the Canadian Charter affirms that Charter rights do not abrogate or derogate from Indigenous rights (15:48, 15 February 2026)
  45. Section 25 operates as a shield, not a source, of rights (15:50, 15 February 2026)
  46. Section 25 does not define Indigenous law (15:51, 15 February 2026)
  47. Reliance on Section 25 does not imply acceptance of Charter supremacy (15:52, 15 February 2026)
  48. Tsm’syen law is not subject to Charter reinterpretation (15:53, 15 February 2026)
  49. International law may recognize Indigenous rights and legal orders (15:54, 15 February 2026)
  50. Recognition does not transfer authority to international bodies (15:56, 15 February 2026)

View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)