Short pages

Showing below up to 50 results in range #1 to #50.

1. (hist) '''location entry''' [41 bytes]
2. (hist) Mutual recognition preserves unity [56 bytes]
3. (hist) Each community governs its internal affairs. [70 bytes]
4. (hist) Local conditions may shape lawful application. [70 bytes]
5. (hist) Houses link law across communities. [72 bytes]
6. (hist) Coordination supports shared understanding of law. [77 bytes]
7. (hist) Written guidance does not substitute lived application. [78 bytes]
8. (hist) Communication prevents fragmentation or contradiction. [82 bytes]
9. (hist) Community governance operates within broader Nation law. [89 bytes]
10. (hist) Coordination does not create hierarchy between communities. [94 bytes]
11. (hist) Community authority is not erased by Nation-level coordination [103 bytes]
12. (hist) Variation does not imply conflict or error. [124 bytes]
13. (hist) Recognition does not transfer authority to international bodies [140 bytes]
14. (hist) Teaching Ensures Correct Understanding of Meaning and Limits [140 bytes]
15. (hist) Use of international law is strategic and contextual [141 bytes]
16. (hist) Failure to coordinate weakens trust [149 bytes]
17. (hist) International norms do not reinterpret Indigenous law [151 bytes]
18. (hist) Balance is maintained through dialogue and witnessing [152 bytes]
19. (hist) Communities may refuse unlawful direction [153 bytes]
20. (hist) Consistent understanding supports unity [154 bytes]
21. (hist) Correct implementation strengthens Nation law [154 bytes]
22. (hist) UNDRIP does not replace Indigenous legal orders [154 bytes]
23. (hist) External pressure does not define implementation [156 bytes]
24. (hist) UNDRIP does not define the content of Tsm’syen law [156 bytes]
25. (hist) Section 25 does not define Indigenous law [158 bytes]
26. (hist) Lawful refusal protects autonomy [165 bytes]
27. (hist) UNDRIP recognizes the right to self-determination and self-governance [166 bytes]
28. (hist) Teaching shared principles supports future governance [170 bytes]
29. (hist) Implementation does not permit centralized control [172 bytes]
30. (hist) Ayaawx remains the primary legal authority [172 bytes]
31. (hist) Tsm’syen law is not subject to Charter reinterpretation [177 bytes]
32. (hist) Section 25 operates as a shield, not a source, of rights [178 bytes]
33. (hist) International law may recognize Indigenous rights and legal orders [180 bytes]
34. (hist) Tsm’syen law exists independently of external recognition [183 bytes]
35. (hist) International law is supportive, not interpretive [186 bytes]
36. (hist) Reference to UNDRIP supports, but does not constrain, Tsm’syen authority [192 bytes]
37. (hist) Differences arise from history, place, and relationship [193 bytes]
38. (hist) Reliance on Section 25 does not imply acceptance of Charter supremacy [198 bytes]
39. (hist) UNDRIP affirms the existence of Indigenous peoples, laws, and rights [202 bytes]
40. (hist) Law is implemented through conduct, decision-making, and response. [218 bytes]
41. (hist) External instruments may affirm, but do not create, Indigenous law [219 bytes]
42. (hist) Section 25 of the Canadian Charter affirms that Charter rights do not abrogate or derogate from Indigenous rights [230 bytes]
43. (hist) Practice occurs at the community, house, and clan levels. [231 bytes]
44. (hist) Reference does not imply surrender of authority [232 bytes]
45. (hist) Guidance respects local context and history [235 bytes]
46. (hist) Houses support lawful continuity [247 bytes]
47. (hist) Elders do not impose uniform outcomes [251 bytes]
48. (hist) Elders may assist in clarifying law across communities. [262 bytes]
49. (hist) Movement between communities does not dissolve house obligations. [263 bytes]
50. (hist) Tsmsyen Map Portal [279 bytes]